🌐 English Vào học →

The lamp that outlived the plan

B2 Về FitForm 222 từ · đọc khoảng 1 phút

A fire station in California has a light bulb that has been burning, almost continuously, since 1901. It is not a miracle and it is not a conspiracy, and the real explanation is more interesting than either.

The bulb has a thick carbon filament and runs at a very low power, producing about as much light as a candle. A thick filament evaporates slowly. Low power keeps it cool. Under those conditions a filament lasts a very long time and gives almost no useful light, which is precisely the trade-off that early manufacturers faced and later ones resolved in the other direction.

From the 1920s, bulb makers agreed a standard life of around a thousand hours. The agreement is frequently cited as deliberate sabotage, and part of it was: the group fined members whose bulbs lasted longer. But the engineering behind the number was real. A hotter filament is far more efficient, converting more electricity into light and less into heat, and it burns out sooner. Choosing a thousand hours was choosing brightness and efficiency over longevity.

The case is useful because both stories are true at once. There was a cartel, and there was also a genuine trade-off that any engineer would have had to make. Deciding which mattered more requires knowing the numbers rather than choosing the more satisfying narrative.

Từ vựng trong bài

  • evaporate /ɪˈvæpɚˌeɪt/ — bay hơi
  • useful /ˈjusfəl/ — hữu ích
  • trade-off /tɹˈeɪˌdɔf/ — sự đánh đổi
  • resolve /ɹiˈzɑlv/ — giải quyết dứt điểm
  • cite /ˈsaɪt/ — trích dẫn
  • deliberate /dɪˈlɪbɚət/ — cố ý; thong thả
  • efficiency /ɪˈfɪʃənsi/ — hiệu suất
  • require /ɹˌiˈkwaɪɚ/ — yêu cầu, đòi hỏi
  • narrative /ˈnæɹətɪv/ — câu chuyện kể

Làm bài tập của bài này

Bài có 4 câu trắc nghiệm (trong đó 1 câu suy luận) và 1 câu trả lời viết. Đăng nhập FitForm để làm bài, đo tốc độ đọc, lưu từ sai vào sổ lỗi và được chấm bài viết — miễn phí.

Đăng nhập để làm bài tập